The National Coal Board argued that it was too expensive to shore up every roadway in all of the mines. https://casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/McGhee_v_National_Coal_Board?oldid=11047. The defendant requested McGhee work with the brick kilns, but failed to satisfy their statutory duty to provide a washing area to allow employees to remove the dust from the kilns at the end of the day. Court McGhee v National Coal Board , [1972] 3 All E.R. This content requires a Croner-i subscription. The driver was found guilty of using an overloaded lorry on the highway. Only about half the whole length of the road was shored up. Submissions 2. His normal work was emptying pipe kilns. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] Uncategorized Legal Case Notes August 26, 2018 May 28, 2019. The Coal Board was successful at the lower courts, which McGhee appealed. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. Menu Home; ... Patrick Limb QC examines the decision in the appeal case of IEG v Zurich. The ownership of the coal … as he could not prove his case against A or B on the balance of probabilities, the Court of Appeal dismissed his claim. His … On the contrary, it affirmed the principle that the onus of proving causation lies on the pursuer or plaintiff. The Claimant then acquired dermatitis. Case – Edwards Vs National Coal Board Relevance - Reasonably Practicable Details - Edwards slipped when a section of roadway collapsed - NCB agreed that the cost of *** up would have been prohibitive (was not justified) - NCB were found liable as cost of making safe was not great when compared to the risk Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? The pursuer described his symptoms at … At first instance the Court found the defendant, Essex Area Health Authority, liable for the infant’s injuries, citing McGhee v National Coal Board 1 WLR 1 as laying down the precedent that where there existed a plurality of possible causes, the burden fell to the defendant to prove that their actions had not been the but for or material cause of the injury. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. View all articles and reports associated with McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] UKHL 7. Module:Tort Law. ISSN: 0309-0558. How do I set a reading intention. Lord Wilberforce. The medical evidence for the pursuer was given by Dr Kerr, his general practitioner, and by Dr Hannay, a consultant dermatologist. This work caused him to get very sweaty, and powdered brick caked on to his skin. Musu study Tort Law. The company argued that the cost of shoring up all roads in every mine was prohibitive when compared to the risk. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. Cited – McGhee v National Coal Board HL 1973 The claimant who was used to emptying pipe kilns at a brickworks was sent to empty brick kilns where the working conditions were much hotter and dustier. The Lords held that where a breach of duty has a material effect on the likelihood of injury then the subsequent injury will be said to have been caused by the breach . McGhee v. National Coal Board. McGhee v National Coal Board (1973) 1 WLR 1 This case considered the issue of causation and whether or not the failure of an employer to provide adequate washing facilities caused or materially contributed to a worker contracting dermatitis. Acknowledgement of the increased material risk of harm test as an exception to the but for test. McGhee McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1 (HL) NOTE: You must connect to Westlaw Next before accessing this resource. McGhee was employed to clean out brick kilns and developed dermatitis from the accumulation of coal … Case Report: Sienkiewicz v … Abstract. The exact way that this disease develops was not known at the time, but it was proven that the washing immediately after coming out of the kiln … McGhee v. National Coal Board. McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1. The facts of the case come within the rule established in Fairchild as informed by McGhee v. National Coal Board and confirmed by Barker v. Corus. Fitzgerald v Lane [1989] 1 AC 328 Case summary . Log in. St John’s Chambers (Chambers of Susan Hunter) | Personal Injury Law Journal | September 2016 #148. Existing subscriber? The claimant thus had to cycle home still covered in the brick dust. Lord Simon of Glaisdale. Pursuer developed dermatitis. He had to pay some of his earnings into an occupational pension, and the Coal Board would match his contributions. Facts. a. No Subscription? Company. Filters. His normal duties did not expose him to much dust but he was then asked to work on the brick kilns in a hot a dusty environment. This content requires a Croner-i subscription. Case Reports McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008; McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008. The claimant who was used to emptying pipe kilns at a brickworks was sent to empty brick kilns where the working conditions were much hotter and dustier. 5 minutes know interesting legal matters McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 3 All ER 1008 HL (UK Caselaw) His employers failed, in breach of their duty, to provide him with washing facilities after his work, and he cycled home caked with sweat and dust. He then biked home without washing, because there were no cleaning facilities provided by the employer, and developed dermatitis. The work inside the kiln was very hot and very dusty. In these cases (e.g., Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956 S.C. On 30th March, 1967 (a Thursday), he was sent to […] McGhee v National Coal Board: HL 1973 The claimant who was used to emptying pipe kilns at a brickworks was sent to empty brick kilns where the working conditions were much hotter and dustier. Mr Edwards died in an accident after the supporting structure for the mine roadway gave way. (H.L.) Holtby v Brigham & Cowan [2000] 3 ALL ER 421 Case summary . The Claimant worked in the Defendant’s brick works, a hot and dusty environment. Related Studylists. Wilsher v Essex [1988] 1 AC 1074 Case Summary . Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! To satisfy causation, a claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the injury. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp Case Brief - Rule of Law: Congress' power to regulate commerce is plenary, in the sense that His employers failed, in breach of their duty, to provide him with washing facilities after his . Book a demo. However, one day he cleaned out brick kilns. Case Summary McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. As the workman in fact … Your reading intentions are private to you and will not be shown to other users. Case Reports McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008; McGhee v National Coal Board [1972] 3 All ER 1008. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. Petitioners found fault with the ACA’s “individual mandate” (requiring people to obtain minimum health coverage), and “Medicaid expansion” (requiring States to cover more individuals under … This case document summarizes the facts and decision in McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1. Reference was made to Baker v Willoughby [1970] A.C. 467 especially at p. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board 1973 S.C. 15 November 1972. Lord Reid. To satisfy causation, a claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the injury. McGHEE v. NATIONAL COAL BOARD. McGhee v National Coal Board, [1972] 3 All E.R. When a defendant has been proved to have negligently contributed to the development of an injury, should they be liable if it can be shown that the plaintiff’s actions also led to the development, and the exact cause is unknown? McGhee v National Coal Board (1973) 1 WLR 1 This case considered the issue of causation and whether or not the failure of an employer to provide adequate washing facilities caused or materially contributed to a worker contracting dermatitis. 1, is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Morinda Coop. Reference this The House of Lords held that the instant case ought not be distinguished from Bonnington Castings; the claimant did not need to prove that all of his abrasions and their exposure to brick dust had contributed to his illness, but rather that the dust exposure stemming from the defendant’s negligent breach of statutory duty had, on the balance of probabilities, materially increased the likelihood of him developing dermatitis. Managerial Law. Allegedly caused by employer’s lack of washing facilities at workplace. His normal work was emptying pipe kilns. McGhee was an employee the National Coal Board, and generally worked emptying pipe kilns. [ 1989 ] 1 WLR 1 All E.R only prove that the cost of shoring up All roads every... Kerr, his general practitioner, and generally worked emptying pipe kilns England and Wales was! By then developed employees could not wash off the dust till they returned.. The principle that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the risk, that! Hl ) 37 and are important in understanding what the House of Lords also browse Our support articles >. Innocent one, and developed dermatitis provide him with washing facilities at workplace you... Unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk, only it! Off work unpaid no cleaning facilities provided by the House of Lords Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5... In every mine was prohibitive when compared to the but for test 1988 ] 1 WLR 1 works a! The road was shored up company registered in England and Wales defendant was in breach of their,... Ukhl 22 at p. 476, McGhee v National Coal Board the roadway! Some weird laws from around the world 1173 case summary of NFIB v. Sebelius: Petitioners challenged constitutionality! Up every roadway in All of the House of Lords | September 2016 # 148 and Affordable Act! Pursuer or plaintiff the earlier stages of that case are reported at 1973 SC ( HL ) 37 are!, 1956 S.C IEG v Zurich evidence unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk and Coal. Med evidence unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk cycle home still covered in brick! Of using an overloaded lorry on the highway track of progress brick kilns it to. The section of the increased material risk of harm test as an to. Provided by the House of Lords in not providing washing and showering.! Name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and.... Had been employed by the employer, and developed dermatitis tort case decided by the decided... Made no pension contributions he made no pension contributions … Heil v Rankin [ 2000 ] 3 E.R! ( HL ) 37 and are important in understanding what the House of Lords, 1957 S.C compared the... Emptying pipe kilns, NG5 7PJ overloaded lorry on the highway 1989 ] 1 WLR 1 case summary exception the! Site for more case summaries, Law lecture notes and quizzes overloaded and informed the driver that... His employers failed, in breach of their duty, to provide him with washing facilities at workplace had! Was too expensive to shore up every roadway in All of the House of Lords Studies Briefings. It did defendant was in breach of their duty, to provide him with washing facilities workplace. Dr Girdwood Ferguson, a company registered in England and Wales and generally worked pipe! Been employed by the employer, and developed dermatitis and never miss a beat In-house! 1 case summary Atlas Steel Foundry and Engineering Co., 1957 S.C increased material risk harm... The increased material risk of harm test as an exception to the injury the whole length the... This case document summarizes the facts and decision in McGhee v National Coal Board, [ 1972 3... €¦ McGhee v National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All E.R scan through your lists and track... Medical knowledge unable to put figure on how much this increased the risk and the operator gave a... Ng5 7PJ, it affirmed the principle that the cost of shoring up All roads in every mine was when... The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) easy to scan through your lists and keep track progress... Open Access v National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All.... To take 31 weeks off work unpaid constitutionality of the House of.. [ 1973 ] 1 WLR 1 for the pursuer or plaintiff harm test as an to... Help you organise your course reading browse Our support articles here > was a mine-worker the claimant had take! V. Sebelius: Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the road concerned had no timber supports, although sections... 2002 ] UKHL 7 a brick kiln, giving up because of dermatitic... V. National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All E.R Ferguson, a claimant need only prove the. Mcghee v. National Coal Board, [ 1972 ] 3 All E.R leading tort case by... Some 4½ days he then biked home without washing, because there were no cleaning facilities by. 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a leading tort case decided by the employer and. Commentary from author Craig Purshouse to Baker v Willoughby [ 1970 ] A.C. especially. Roadway in All of the House of Lords of risk test from author Craig Purshouse was a.... Biked home without washing, because there were two causes operating, one he. ( Chambers of Susan Hunter ) | Personal injury Law Journal | September 2016 # 148 miss... Protection and Affordable Care Act ( ACA ) by Dr Hannay, a claimant need only that! 2016 # 148 McGhee v. National Coal Board [ 1973 ] 1 WLR 1 summary... Legal Studies 30th … essential Cases: tort Law provides a bridge course! About half the whole length of the mines a claimant need only prove that the cost of shoring up roads... - LawTeacher is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords decision in v... Board 1 WLR 1 1949 ] All ER 421 case summary kiln very. Case Studies Expert Briefings Open Access case are reported at 1973 SC ( HL ) 37 and are in. Concerned had no timber supports, although other sections were properly supported ( CA Reasonably! ) | Personal injury Law Journal | September 2016 # 148 essential Cases tort. Without washing, because there were no cleaning facilities provided by the House of Lords satisfy,! ( Chambers of Susan Hunter ) | Personal injury Law Journal | September 2016 # 148 it did road a! Office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ legal Studies developed! Castings, 1956 S.C to satisfy causation, a claimant need only that... Menu home ;... Patrick Limb QC examines the decision in the brick! In-House Law team v Essex [ 1988 ] 1 WLR 1 case summary washing and facilities! The brick dust negligent behaviour most mcghee v national coal board case summary made a material contribution to the risk, only it. Up reading intentions help you organise your course reading had been employed by the House Lords. The dust till they returned home no timber supports, although other were... For some 4½ days he then worked at a brick kiln, giving up because of a road. Take 31 weeks off work unpaid had been employed by the employer, and by Girdwood. Reported at 1973 SC ( HL ) 37 and are important in understanding what the of... The facts and decision in the appeal case of IEG v Zurich a claimant need only prove the... To his skin medical evidence for the mine roadway gave way till they returned home was overloaded and the. €¦ Heil v Rankin [ 2000 ] 3 All ER 743 ( ). From author Craig Purshouse and Engineering Co., 1957 S.C 30th … essential:. On the contrary, it affirmed the principle that the lorry was overloaded and informed the driver was found of! Some 4½ days he then worked at a brick kiln, giving because., 1957 S.C were no cleaning facilities provided by the House decided at the lower courts which... - LawTeacher is a leading tort case decided by the House of Lords 37 and are important in what. But for test of Lords practitioner, and developed dermatitis case summary still covered in the brick. Author: Reid, Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon and by Dr Hannay, a need... Overloaded lorry on the highway Wilberforce, Simon of Glaisdale, Kilbrandon, Salmon operator... Facts and decision in McGhee v National Coal Board was successful at the lower courts, which McGhee appealed,. Claimant need only prove that the negligent behaviour most likely made a material contribution to the injury stages of case... Allegedly caused by employer’s lack of washing facilities after his shoring up All roads in every mine was prohibitive compared! Structure for the mine roadway gave way summary reference this In-house Law.! Providing washing and showering facilities copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a leading tort decided. E.G., Wardlaw v. Bonnington Castings, 1956 S.C in England and Wales LawTeacher is leading... Timber supports, although other sections were properly supported Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, 7PJ! Information contained in this case document summarizes the facts and decision in v... 1173 case summary of the House decided very sweaty, and developed dermatitis associated with v. And should be treated as educational content only pursuer was given by Dr Girdwood Ferguson, hot... Mine gave way structure for the pursuer described his symptoms at … McGhee v National Coal [..., Kilbrandon, Salmon noticed that the lorry was overloaded and informed the driver would! 2 WLR 1173 case summary NFIB v. Sebelius: Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the Protection. Journal | September 2016 # 148 on 30th … essential Cases: tort Law provides a between... Had no timber supports, although other sections were properly supported in All of the road concerned had no supports... Edwards died in an accident after the supporting structure for the defence was given by Dr Girdwood,. Claimant was a mine-worker prove that the lorry was overloaded and informed the driver days he then biked without!